The right not to tolerate the intolerant
Child survivors of Auschwitz, wearing adult-size prisoner jackets, stand behind a barbed wire fence. Public domain.
“A country is not only what it does but what it tolerates”.
― Kurt Tucholsky
I first came across the Holocaust
when I was fourteen years old. I misidentified Maus for a common graphic novel, and
I bought it during one of my weekend trips to the bookshop downtown. It was a
difficult read, oblivious as I was to what motivated the war and the atrocities
committed by the Third Reich. It took me some time to realise what the author
was getting at by depicting the Nazis as cats, the Jews as mice and the Polish
as pigs. The whole root of the trouble was that they looked like animals, but
they were people. The victims, the perpetrators, and the bystanders were
complex and unpredictable, capable of the best and the worst, of sacrifice and
betrayal.
The whole concept of the
Holocaust didn’t sink in until I read Anne´s
Frank diary. Whereas Maus challenged
how I understood the world, her diary changed how I perceived my place in it. If
a little girl could be sent to die in a terrible place, away from her family
and friends, I wasn’t sure fascism couldn’t arrive at my country and claim my
life.
At an unspecified moment, the
issue was lost in one of the many regions in my mind. But it was never
forgotten. My last high school paper was about the Holocaust. And before
finishing college, I was determined to know more. I suppose my curiosity as a
novice political writer, tempered by my still insipid sense of political
responsibility, made it impossible for me to postpone the visit any longer.
Reading Primo Levi's If This is a Man confirmed my
commitment, and I made up my mind to visit Auschwitz the following year.
The memory of the Holocaust is fading, and our conscience is becoming dormant once more.
It was a chilly winter day. I exited
the bus without a word. There was nothing I could say. There was nothing my
friends wanted to hear. More than 1,1 million people were starved, tortured,
and murdered in that dark, windy region of southern Poland, near Oświęcim. We
left behind the “Arbeit Macht Frei” sign and made our way into the camp. The
silence was unbearable. And as we approached the end of the block’s yard, where
thousands of prisoners
were shot dead, we were reminded of what intolerance can lead to.
The visit lasted several hours.
It included the main campsite, blocks two and three, the barracks at the Auschwitz
II-Birkenau camp, the crematorium,
and the gas chambers. The camp forces visitors to acknowledge that this happened, and this is how. Every building has thousands
of stories to tell. Every inch speaks of indescribable loss and terrible
sacrifice. There´s no forgetting that human madness and indifference made
it possible. From the barbed wire to the barracks. From the main gate to the yard.
From the gas chambers to the crematorium. You know why you are there.
The camp forces visitors to acknowledge that this happened, and this is how.
The photographs represent real people,
with real names and real families. Rudolf Brumlík, Rosette Wolczak, Lea Deutsch,
Benjamin, and Lina Fondane. Men, women, and children
separated from each other. People who died for no reason. People who cannot be
forgotten.
An inevitable defeat?
Seventy years after one of the
worst atrocities this world has ever witnessed, we want to believe that what happened
in Auschwitz-Birkenau, Belzec, Chelmno, Majdanek, Sobibor and Treblinka can´t
happen again. We are told that the world
is becoming ever more peaceful, and that reason will prevent us from
targeting people because of their ideas, believes and birthplace.
Most people might prefer this
narrative. However, the rise
of populism and the collapse
of the centre-left are a stern warning that the world is not getting safer
for everyone. Inequality is
rising, our societies are becoming more polarised, and we behold the global
revival of nationalism. Our politicians might
have other priorities but as the support for far-right parties and the hostility
towards immigrants rises, to look the other way is an insult to the memory of those who perished seven
decades ago.
The rise of populism and the collapse of the centre-left are a stern warning that the world is not getting safer for everyone.
In Italy, the government has pledged
to deport five hundred thousand illegal immigrants, manipulating grievances
and using human beings as bargaining chips. In Germany, the far-right has
grown from a fringe party to an important actor in national and federal
politics. In Austria, the Freedom Party has entered a coalition with the
government, despite a wave of anti-Semitic
scandals, while the anti-immigration Sweden Democrats won eighteen per cent
of the vote in the last general election, despite links to neo-Nazi
movements. Things don’t look any better in
France, where Marine Le Pen compared
the sight of Muslims praying in the street to the Nazi occupation during
World War Two. In Hungary, the president has said that he does not
want his country to be multi-coloured and promised to protect it from Muslim migrants. And
in Spain, a far-right party won twelve parliament seats in a regional election
for the first time in decades, being congratulated for doing so by
a former Ku Klux Klan leader.
Many believe that disaster is
still far away from Europe´s
doors. However, according to a CNN
poll published in November, the memory of the Holocaust is fading, and our conscience is becoming dormant
once more. A third of Europeans say they knew little about what happened in
Auschwitz. In France, one out of five people between eighteen and thirty-four
years old claim to have never
heard of the Holocaust. And according to
the same poll, ten per cent of Europeans admitted having
unfavourable views of Jews. Thirty-seven per cent said the same about
Muslims. Thirty-six per cent admitted having unfavourable views of immigrants.
As Camus predicted, the end of
the war was not a definitive victory against madness, tribalism, and fascism. The
struggle will have to be waged over and
over again.
German children reading “The Poisonous Mushroom”, a book intended as anti-Semitic propaganda. Photo Tractatus/Flickr. Some rights reserved.
An endless lesson?
It should be obvious that no one
hides in the heart of occupied city unless they have an alternative, just as no
one decides to cross the Mediterranean with their children unless they are
desperate. Anne Frank died because her family was unable to get visas to leave
for America; she died because the west was
indifferent to her suffering.
In Europe, indifference to
suffering become a sensitive subject after the war. Politicians and scholars realised
that young people had
to know what happened in concentration camps, who was persecuted and the
dangers of exclusionary policies. Symbolic places and memorials were built to
honour the dead. And to remind the living that we are never far away enough
from the next disaster.
Visiting the camp should be a mandatory stop for every
European citizen, reminding us that moral courage requires empathy, conviction,
and bravery.
Schools have a responsibility to
further their students’ knowledge and help them develop a moral compass that
allows them to navigate the contaminated waters of public discourse. Colleges
shouldn’t be only four-year intelligence tests; education is also about
personal growth and social responsibility. Visiting concentration camps and
symbolic places may help students acknowledge the
risks and consequences of the lack of tolerance, the value of pluralism and
the dangers of remaining indifferent in a democracy.
Because democratic institutions
depend on values, and values can only endure if they are defended, cultivated,
and taught. If we expect our children to lend a hand to people in need, instead
of turning away, we can´t forget our history. Nor can we allow others to
rewrite it.
Colleges shouldn’t be only four-year intelligence tests. Education is also about personal growth and social responsibility.
The Holocaust and the targeting
of millions of people during the war was not an accident in history. It was not
an isolated episode of human madness and cruelty. It started with words and
hate. It was fuelled by division and intolerance. It was allowed by fear and
indifference. And it will happen again if we don’t prepare our children to
resist the rhetoric
of charlatans that place their interests over human lives.
It was by reading about the life
and times of Vladek
Spiegelman in Maus, a life-changing
book, that I first realised that human beings are capable of anything. It was thanks to the silent
despair of Primo Levi, who slept in a bed too narrow for him to be afraid, that
I made up my mind to learn more about the Holocaust. And it is because of
people like Chiune
Sugihara and Irena
Sendler, who refused to ignore the suffering of others, that I keep
believing that this is not an inevitable defeat, but an endless lesson.
Democratic institutions depend on values, and values can only endure if they are defended and cultivated.
There are no words to describe
what is like to enter the camp. To visit the barracks and the gas chambers.
Nothing prepares you to see tons of human hair, decaying in a vitrine and
turning to dust. To learn that between 150.000
and 200.000 children died in Auschwitz from 1940 to 1945. But visiting the
camp tells us more about ourselves than we could ever suspect. And should be a
mandatory stop for every European citizen, reminding us that moral courage
requires empathy, conviction, and bravery.
It was in the middle of empty
canisters of Zyklon B poison and hundreds of hairbrushes and toothbrushes that
I finally understood what Anne Frank meant when she wrote that a single candle
can both defy and define the darkness.
Hopefully, we will never allow that
candle to be put out.