Ayotzinapa: the events that shook the Mexican youth

The openMovements series invites leading social scientists to share their research results and perspectives on contemporary social struggles.

Posters with the faces of the 43 students disappeared in Ayotzinapa. Demotix/Alberto-Sibaja Ramirez. All rights reserved. Eight months ago, on September 26, 2014, six young
peoples were assassinated and 43 disappeared after having being arrested by the
police of the Mexican City Iguala and given over to drug cartels. Eight months
later, the 43 students of the Escuela Normal Rural of Ayotzinapa are still missing.
Their story has shown the extension of violence and collusion between the drug
cartels and politics in Mexico.

On the eve of September 24, 2014, Mexico, a country
that has experienced terrible events in the last eight years since the
government of Felipe Calderón launched a direct “war against drugs”, lived through
an event that went far beyond anything previous, one that has been compared to
the atrocities of the Islamic State or Boko Haram for the sheer cruelty and
cold blood of the perpetrators.

The police of the third largest city of the State of
Guerrero, Iguala (around 120,000 inhabitants), one of the poorest, most
violent, most polarized, terroir of
radical movements, scenario of guerrilla warfare and a “dirty war” led by
military forces in the sixties and seventies, attacked a group of around 100
students in a teacher training college in Ayotzinapa (one of the poorest
regions of the State) that had come to confiscate (as they regularly do) a
couple of buses in order to go to Mexico city to participate in the celebrations
of the October 2, 1968 manifestations. The police killed 6 students and
abducted 43 others, delivering them to a local drug gang, led by the mayor’s
wife, who (according to the official version) killed them in cold blood and burned
their corpses in a garbage dump outside the city.

This terrible event aroused a wave of indignation against
the government, both local and national, and a flood of sympathy for the
students and their families, as well as a demand that the government investigate
and discover the truth of the events and prosecute and punish all those
involved.

The governor had to resign after two months of
prevarication, the mayor of Iguala and his wife are accused of complicity, dozens
of policemen are in jail awaiting trial, and the strategy of the federal
government to stop setting violence and the war against drugs as its priority,
unlike that of the previous government, collapsed in the face of this tragic
event and its incapacity to respond seriously to such an unprecedented trauma.

Having described the facts and some of their political
consequences, in this short piece I intend firstly to set side by side the different
interpretations of the causes of this event and then to discuss what the
reaction of the population predicts for the future of Mexican society and
politics.

What happened in
Iguala?

There are two distinct interpretations of what
happened in Iguala. On the one hand, there is the interpretation of those who
have tried to understand the relationship between the local authorities, population
and drug cartels that arose after the “war against drugs”. According to this
interpretation, this event, like others occurring in many other regions of
Mexico: Chihuahua, Veracruz, Tamaulipas, Sinaloa, is part of the drug lords’
advance plan to control a territory rather than, as in the past, controlling
the routes to the United States.

In this strategy, the drug cartels attack other
criminal gangs, the army and the police forces they do not command and terrorize
the population by the use of these types of massacres. They command local
police forces and political authorities, through fear or corruption, and impose
their absolute dominance over a territory in order to be free to plant and
transport drugs without any opposition or risk of denunciation. The
feudalization of the political system in Mexico, as one of the consequences of electoral
reform within a weak civil society, has led to this situation whereby sovereignty
does not depend on elected officials, but on criminal gangs.

This may well describe the situation of certain
regions in the north of the country, such as parts of Chihuahua, Tamaulipas,
Veracruz, and it is in effect one of the situations Mexico is living through at
the present time, but it is not exclusive. There is another situation, currently
characterizing a region such as Guerrero, where this territorial war between
drug lords merges with a more “traditional” situation, best analyzed by
anthropologists. And the story they describe is rather of a “continuum” of violence
exerted by local government forces, the ever-present army (since the guerrilla
wars), the local “caciques” and the paramilitary forces, to which we currently have
to add the drug cartels. Violence in Guerrero has been always exerted against social
activists, journalists, and opposition politicians. A student interviewed by
Margarita Mora considers that in the present round of repression, the drug
cartels have merely substituted the paramilitary forces financed and controlled
by the landlords. His idea is that what exists in Guerrero is a Drug-State: “They
take away our lands, destroy what we own, then try to hire us as low wage labor
for the sowing of poppy, to then accuse us of being criminals. We are squeezed
between those two choices, with no honorable options”[1].

We could add to this picture not only that the peasants
are being robbed of their land but that, more recently, since the neoliberal
turn taken by the Mexican economy and the latest educational reform, most rural
schools have closed down and the rural teachers’colleges, such as the one of
Ayotzinapa, are doomed to disappear.

The reasons are partly economic. As rural schools are
decreasing, so is the need for teachers. Nonetheless, we cannot exclude a more
political rationale connected to the fact that as a consequence of the extreme poverty,
exclusion, and violence in which the rural teachers’ schools are located, they
have traditionally been a source of radical thought, and a cradle nurturing extremist
organizations. In fact, according to
some of the students who fled the massacre of September 24, some soldiers were approached
by others they knew at the hospital when they arrived there wounded. Instead of
offering protection, they told them “…you asked for it, this is happening to
you because of what you are doing”[2]

Protests and the
future of Mexican society and politics

These terrible events caused a tremor in Mexico’s conscience
and provoked an ethical awakening, at least among the young. They provoked an
outcry from that part of Mexican society that is deeply moved by the fate of
some of the poorest inhabitants of this country, young people who had elected
to take the decent route in life, that of a school teacher, instead of becoming
guerrillas or drug hit-men. This was bound to strike the younger generation more
forcefully. Thus, it was the young who organized active strikes, discussion
groups, and sit-ins in dozens of universities all over the country and in other
parts of the world, where the situation of the country was clearly depicted,
especially concerning violence, the perspectives for up and coming generations,
the future for political parties. It was also the young that organized the
three massive manifestations in Mexico City and other capitals of the country
that followed hotfoot one from the other, from September to December 2014; a
mobilization that the country had not experienced since the manifestations of
1968, which ended tragically. 

These protests did not oust the government of Peña
Nieto, although they demanded the resignation of the president, but they did
force the government to react and try to explain what had happened.

They also eventually led to the resignation of the
governor of Guerrero and of the prosecutor of the Republic. Apart from the
demand that the government find the students alive, the other most frequent
slogan that was heard on these marches was the cry that the culprit “was the
State”. This meant that the perpetrators were not only the drug cartels and the
local government as the Government pretended, but the federal State that had allowed
the situation of impunity that permeates the whole country, where deaths are
counted but never investigated, the disappeared are never found, where there is
nobody accused or found guilty, where a handful of criminals end up on trial
and even fewer in jail. A government that had sent the military to fight the
drug cartels with the resulting rapid increase in human rights violations. It
was also the State that was responsible because it has been eliminating the
rural schools and its teachers – people who had turned out to be just too
radical.

Most marked of all were the young Mexicans that
organized the movement #YoSoy132 in 2014 against the manipulation of the media in
favor of the return of the PRI[3]
to the presidency. Like other youngsters in other parts of the world, they were
struck by the realization that they would inherit a world that is increasingly
unequal, polluted and unsustainable.

Mexican youth went to the streets to denounce the fact
that Ayotzinapa only another of those acts of violence, albeit one of the
cruelest, which the Mexican State, directly or indirectly, perpetrates against
its young. Since the sixties, the government has made it clear just how much it
fears its own youthful population. It killed hundreds of students in 1968, an
unknown number in 1971. It prohibited festive manifestations such as the
Mexican Woodstock (Avandaro) once it realized that these gave birth to an
energy the authoritarian PRI government of the time could not control.

Although nothing seems to have changed with the
manifestations for Ayotzinapa, many youngsters protested in public for the
first time in their lives, and gained an awareness of the terrible situation in
which the country finds itself, so different from the official picture. This is
why one can affirm that the Massacre of Ayotzinapa has marked a date in the
modern history of Mexico. There is a clear sense, shared by many young people,
that Ayotzinapa draws a line that creates a before and an after in Mexican
modern history. And that although the capacity for action has receded for now, something
remains in the consciousness of those hundreds of thousands who participated. Even
if they were not able to change the government or the country as they would
have wished, they have transformed themselves.  Their tolerance of injustice has been
irreversibly diminished.

[1] Interview in Mora,
Mariana, “Ayotzinapa, violencia y el sentido del agravio colectivo: reflexiones
para el trabajo antropológico”, Ichan
Tecolotl, no. 293, january 2015.

[2] Hernández Castillo,
R.A.,  “Violencia y militarización en
Guerrero: antecedentes de Ayotzinapa”, Ichan
Tecolotl, no. 293, january 2015.

[3] The Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI) created on the wake of
the Mexican revolution, that governed under different names from 1929 to the
year 2000.

How to cite:
Bizberg I. (2015) «Ayotzinapa: the events that shook the Mexican youth», Open Democracy / ISA RC-47: Open Movements, 27 May. https://opendemocracy.net/ilan-bizberg/ayotzinapa-events-that-shook-mexican-youth